Waterloo Region Generations
A record of the people of Waterloo Region, Ontario.

Sarah

Female 1891 - 1976  (~ 85 years)


Generations:      Standard    |    Compact    |    Text    |    Register    |    PDF

Generation: 1

  1. 1.  Sarah was born CA 1891; died 1976.

    Other Events:

    • Name: Sarah Goebel
    • Eby ID Number: Waterloo-401775

    Sarah — Victor Goebel. Victor was born CA 1891; died 1979. [Group Sheet]

    Children:
    1. 2. Gordon Goebel  Descendancy chart to this point
    2. 3. Marjorie Goebel  Descendancy chart to this point was born 1921; died 8 Feb 1980, North Vancouver, , British Columbia, Canada; was buried 11 Feb 1980, North Vancouver Cemetery, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.


Generation: 2

  1. 2.  Gordon Goebel Descendancy chart to this point (1.Sarah1)

  2. 3.  Marjorie Goebel Descendancy chart to this point (1.Sarah1) was born 1921; died 8 Feb 1980, North Vancouver, , British Columbia, Canada; was buried 11 Feb 1980, North Vancouver Cemetery, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

    Other Events:

    • Name: Marjorie Lemanski
    • Eby ID Number: Waterloo-401772

    Notes:

    LEMANSKI, Mrs. George (the former Marjorie Goebel) - Of North Vancouver, passed away at Lion's Gate Hospital, Vancouver, B.C., on February 8, 1980, in her 60th year, formerly of Hespeler. She is survived by her loving husband George, son Brian, both of North Vancouver; brother Gordon Goebel of Cambridge, (H); daughter-in-law Enid and two grandchildren, Laurie and Casey. She was predeceased by her parents, Victor Goebel in 1979 and Sarah Goebel in 1976. Funeral services were held February 11, 1980, in North Vancouver. Interment was in North Vancouver cemetery.

    Unidentified Newspaper Obituary

    Marjorie — George Lemanski. George (son of Stanislaus "Stanley John" Lemanski and Julia Rejefski) was born CA 1921; died Yes, date unknown. [Group Sheet]

    Children:
    1. 4. Brian Lemanski  Descendancy chart to this point


Generation: 3

  1. 4.  Brian Lemanski Descendancy chart to this point (3.Marjorie2, 1.Sarah1)